Black German Postwar Adoption: Separation, Belonging, and Reconnection

Adoption History

Why postwar Black German adoptees are foundational to BGHRA

In the years following World War II, thousands of children were born in Germany to German women and Black Allied servicemen, most of them African American members of the U.S. occupation forces. Some remained with their mothers or other relatives. Others grew up in German foster families or children’s homes. A significant but still uncertain number were adopted across national borders, many into African American families in the United States.

Their history stands at the intersection of Black German history, African American history, military occupation, child welfare, civil rights, migration, citizenship, and adoption. It is also central to the history and mission of the Black German Heritage & Research Association.

A note on historical language: Postwar records and newspapers often described these children with racialized labels, including “occupation children” and “brown babies.” BGHRA uses such terms only when identifying historical sources, programs, or quotations. We center the people themselves as Black Germans, dual-heritage people, and adoptees.

Born into a Racialized Postwar Order

Yara-Colette Lemke Muniz de Faria’s foundational research shows that, between 1945 and 1955, an estimated 67,770 children were born in West Germany to German women and members of the occupying forces. Of these, approximately 4,776 were the children of African American or Moroccan soldiers. These figures are incomplete, and no reliable total exists for the Black German children later adopted abroad.

Most of these children were not parentless. Contemporary surveys found that the great majority lived with their mothers or other relatives, while a much smaller percentage lived in institutions. Yet Black German children were repeatedly discussed as a special social “problem.” German officials, welfare agencies, churches, journalists, and politicians debated whether they should be integrated into German society, separated from white German children, or sent abroad.

Race was decisive. Blackness was treated as incompatible with Germanness, even though the children had been born and socialized in Germany. Their German mothers’ wishes were often marginalized in official discussions. The actual circumstances of separation varied: poverty, illness, social stigma, family pressure, new marriages, institutional intervention, and sincere fears for a child’s safety and future could all influence a mother’s decision. These were not simple stories of abandonment, nor was there a single reason children entered adoptive care.

The debate was also transatlantic. The Black press—including the Afro-American, Pittsburgh Courier, Chicago Defender, Ebony, and Jet—reported on the children and mobilized aid. African American readers sent clothing, food, medicine, and money; some sponsored children or sought to adopt. The NAACP and Black journalists advanced two sometimes competing positions: Black German children had a right to equal belonging in Germany, but adoption by Black families in the United States might protect children whose future in Germany appeared uncertain. The debate therefore joined Germany’s recent history of racial persecution to the realities of Jim Crow, segregation, and the emerging U.S. civil rights movement.

Adoption Campaigns—and Many Roads to America

In 1951, Chicago teacher Margaret E. Butler finally brought two Black German children to the United States after a years-long struggle with German and American authorities. Their admission under the Displaced Persons Act created an important precedent for later placements.

That same year, Mabel A. Grammer—an African American journalist for the Afro-American and the wife of a U.S. military officer stationed in Mannheim—began the initiative that became known as the Brown Baby Plan. Grammer worked through a transatlantic network that included German mothers, St. Joseph’s Children’s Home in Mannheim, the Afro-American, German courts and officials, Scandinavian Airlines, and prospective African American parents. She helped place hundreds of children with African American families stationed in Germany or living in the United States. In some “by-proxy” adoptions, children and parents first met only when the children arrived in America.

The program was celebrated as a Black-led response to racism and as a challenge to adoption systems that often questioned the fitness of African American parents. It was also criticized for uneven screening, incomplete oversight, limited post-placement follow-up, and uncertainty about whether every required German authority had approved a child’s removal. Both realities belong in the history.

The Brown Baby Plan is important, but it is not the whole story. Some children were adopted directly by African American military families already living in Germany. Others traveled through different private or institutional arrangements. Still others remained in Germany, entered foster care, lived in children’s homes, were adopted domestically, or went to Denmark and elsewhere. Public campaigns produced abundant newspaper coverage, while quieter family arrangements often left only scattered court papers, immigration files, photographs, and memories. What is best documented should not be mistaken for what was most typical.

Silke Hackenesch’s scholarship places these adoptions within the larger history of race, family, civil rights, citizenship, social welfare, and the Cold War. She identifies the placements of Black German children as an early organized form of transnational adoption structured primarily by race. This history began before intercountry adoption became a recognized professional field and before Asian adoption came to dominate the public history of international adoption.

Beyond a Single Rescue Story

The history of Black German adoption cannot be understood through a simple choice between “rescue” and “harm.” Adoption created real and often loving families. Many adoptees describe secure childhoods, close relationships with their adoptive parents, educational opportunity, and gratitude for the lives their families built together. Others experienced secrecy, isolation, racism, emotional or physical harm, or uncertainty about their legal identities. Members of the same adoptive family could remember their childhoods very differently.

Rosemarie Peña’s research insists that there is no single or monolithic Black German adoptee experience. Age at placement, time in institutional care, family structure, class, geography, military or civilian life, schooling, skin tone, and access to Black community all shaped individual lives.

Adoption also reorganized identity on paper. Closed proceedings could seal original birth and adoption records. Children received new names and documents, while earlier names, relatives, places, and histories became difficult to trace. Adoption, immigration, and naturalization were separate legal processes; becoming part of an American family did not automatically resolve every question of citizenship. For some adoptees, missing or contradictory records later complicated passports, family searches, immigration status, and efforts to understand whether German citizenship had been retained or lost.

Migration changed the meaning of race rather than ending its effects. In Germany, Blackness had been used to cast the children as foreign. In the United States, their Blackness could be understood as a basis for belonging within African American families and communities. Yet many adoptees also grew up conscious that they were German-born, biracial, adopted, and culturally distinct from both their parents and their African American peers. Their experiences show that transracial adoption can occur within Black families as well as across a Black–white racial divide.

Search, Return, and “Re-kinning”

The road to America was not the end of this history. Beginning by at least the late 1980s, German-born adoptees exchanged information through William Gage’s Geborener Deutscher newsletter and, later, through email lists, online forums, social media, genealogy platforms, and DNA databases. They learned how to request records from German registry offices and youth welfare agencies, locate translators, search for mothers and fathers, and support one another through reunion and loss.

Some searches led to lasting relationships with parents, siblings, and extended families. Some ended at gravesites, in rejection, or with unanswered questions. Others produced a different form of reunion: adoptees found one another and became part of a globally connected Black German community.

Peña describes this work as “re-kinning”—the effort to renew relationships with family, culture, community, place, and history after adoption had interrupted or obscured them. Adoptees did not simply recover a hidden past. By collecting documents, recording testimony, tracing genealogy, and sharing stories, they became researchers and makers of the historical record. Their searches helped create the transatlantic community from which BGHRA emerged.

At BGHRA’s inaugural convention in 2011, keynote speaker Noah Sow emphasized that the adoptees’ absence had also been a loss for Black Germans who remained in Germany. The people sent abroad might otherwise have become their sisters, brothers, parents, teachers, neighbors, artists, and community leaders. Reconnection therefore matters not only to individual families. It restores relationships within the wider Black German diaspora and helps all generations understand a shared—and divided—history.

Why This History Is Central to BGHRA

Postwar Black German adoptees are not the entirety of BGHRA’s constituency, but they are a foundational part of it. BGHRA was founded by Rosemarie Peña, a member of this historic cohort, and grew from decades of transatlantic networking among Black Germans, adoptees, relatives, scholars, artists, and community advocates.

The adoptees’ history brings together nearly every part of BGHRA’s mission:

• preserving Black German history and cultural memory;
• connecting people and knowledge across Germany, the United States, and the wider diaspora;
• bringing community testimony into conversation with academic research;
• supporting ethical family-history, archival, and genealogical work;
• examining race, childhood, migration, citizenship, kinship, and belonging together; and
• ensuring that Black Germans are not merely studied by others but participate in interpreting and preserving their own histories.

This is what BGHRA means by scholarly activism: research carried out with communities, accountable to their knowledge and needs, and directed toward public understanding, connection, and repair.

The work is increasingly urgent. Members of the postwar generation, their first families, and their adoptive families are aging. Personal papers remain scattered, institutional records can be difficult to access, and memories disappear when they are not recorded. BGHRA’s conferences, audiovisual archive, oral histories, public programs, and developing Special Collection at the Paul Robeson Library at Rutgers University–Camden help preserve this history for adoptees, descendants, students, educators, and future researchers.

At BGHRA, postwar adoptees are not simply subjects of history. They are witnesses, scholars, genealogists, archivists, organizers, and builders of community. Their lives reveal how race and policy separated families across the Atlantic—and how people separated as children have spent adulthood recovering names, relationships, citizenship histories, and one another.

Related research, advocacy, and regional histories

Continue with BGHRA’s related research, advocacy, and comparative histories:

Explore Peña’s RCTA-TRACE Framework for an introduction to adoption, culture, and belonging for adoptees and their families.

Help Preserve This History

BGHRA welcomes contact from Black German adoptees, first and adoptive family members, descendants, researchers, and individuals who hold relevant documents, photographs, films, correspondence, or testimony. Materials and stories are considered only with the knowledge and consent of the people concerned.

Contact: info@bghra.org

Selected Scholarship and Media

• Sonya Donaldson, “‘How does it feel to be a problem?’ Black German Girlhood and the Historical Entanglements of Nation”. Women, Gender, and Families of Color 7, no. 1 (Spring 2019): 12–36. A comparative reading of Doris McMillon’s Mixed Blessing and Ika Hügel-Marshall’s Invisible Woman, examining Black girlhood, disrupted family relationships, and racial and national belonging in Germany and the United States.
• Yara-Colette Lemke Muniz de Faria, Zwischen Fürsorge und Ausgrenzung: Afrodeutsche “Besatzungskinder” im Nachkriegsdeutschland (Metropol, 2002).
• Yara-Colette Lemke Muniz de Faria, “‘Germany’s ‘Brown Babies’ Must Be Helped! Will You?’: U.S. Adoption Plans for Afro-German Children, 1950–1955,” Callaloo 26, no. 2 (2003): 342–362.
• Yara-Colette Lemke Muniz de Faria, “‘In Their Best Interest…’: Afro-German Children in Postwar German Children’s Homes,” BGHRA conference presentation (2012).
• Rosemarie Peña, “Stories Matter: Experiences of Black German Adoptees in the U.S.,” in Children of the Liberation: Transatlantic Experiences and Perspectives of Black Germans of the Post-War Generation (2019).
• Rosemarie Peña, “From Both Sides of the Atlantic: Black German Adoptee Searches in William Gage’s Geborener Deutscher (Born German),” Genealogy 2, no. 4 (2018).
• Silke Hackenesch, “Colorblind Love or Racial Responsibility? (Black) Adoptive Families in Postwar America and Transnational Civil Rights,” University of Cologne research project.
• Silke Hackenesch, ed., Adoption across Race and Nation: US Histories and Legacies (Ohio State University Press, 2022), including Hackenesch’s “Love across the Color Line? Pearl S. Buck and the Adoption of Afro-German Children after World War II” and Peña’s “Black Germans: Coming Home to Self and Community.”

BGHRA NEWS